Moulds from FFFF
From:
Jon Hunwick (Delcam International PLC)
Date:
Thursday, July 28, 1994
From: Jon Hunwick (Delcam International PLC)
To: Gregory Pettengill (Cote Art & Engineering)
Date: Thursday, July 28, 1994
Forwarded to RP-ML by Greg, 94 08 03
Subject: Moulds from FFFF
Greg,
Thanks for last nights mail. I will attempt to answer your questions.
The process for making resin casts from a model is **exactly** the same as
the methods which would be employed for getting castings from a wooden
master model. The first step is to make simple wooden boxes (with slight
tapers on the vertical sides). These form the two main halves of the mould.
The part is coated in a releasing agent, and suspended so it sits neatly in
the lower box to the correct depth (i.e. the parting line is level with the
top edge of the box). The resin is poured in, and allowed to cure. The top
face of the resin is then treated with releasing agent, and the second box
placed atop the first. Resin is again poured, so as to completely submerge
the part.
When it has fully cured, the box can be split open and the solid resin
pieces removed. To finish the 'tool' holes have to be drilled to allow
filling (and air to get out), but this is simple enough.
If (as in the case of the oil gallery I mentioned before) the part cannot be
cast as above, because there are overhangs, non-straight split lines etc.
then things (obviously) get a lot more complex to figure out, but with care,
patience (and a fair amount of black magic help from your friendly, local
pattern maker) most things **can** be made in this way. However, there is a
distinct trade off between the amount of effort necessary and the cost of
making a FFFF model and then destroying it.
Another alternative I have seen (which works well for parts with no
re-entrant features) is to simply cover the whole thing in some form of
synthetic rubber. I don't know what the stuff is called I'm afraid, but I'll
try to find out. When cured it is faintly translucent, meaning that you can
still see the part buried in the middle. To extract the part, the rubber is
cut open with a bluntish instrument, which causes it to tear rather than
slice. This leaves a very rough looking split face, but that can actually be
an advantage as it means the two halves of the 'tool' always sit together
correctly.
It seems to me that the whole point of RP is to do things RAPIDLY!!
Before choosing a course of action make sure you choose the most rapid
method, which is not necessarily the most elegant!
Second question - what is the most flexible material?
Well, that depends on what you mean by flexible - bendy or versatile?
The most bendy I've seen is the polythene type material used by the fused
extrusion type machines, but the downside is that the models themselves
aren't exactly spectacular. The best of this type of machine is from
STRATASYS of Minnesota.
As to versatility, my preference is for the LOM (which incidentally is the
most environmentally friendly of the FFFFs as it takes paper and turns it
back into bits of tree!). The finished part can be treated in almost exactly
the same way as wood, and can be sanded, drilled (even tapped), stained,
painted, polished, etc. If push comes to shove it can also be sawn up (with
care) if that is necessary to make the mould.
Talk to you again soon.
Jon Hunwick
Previous message
| Next message
Back to 1994 index