Re: STL format MISINFORMATION (long)
From:
Michael Brindley
Date:
Friday, October 7, 1994
From: Michael Brindley
To: Elaine Hunt (Clemson University)
Cc: RP-ML
Date: Friday, October 7, 1994
Subject: Re: STL format MISINFORMATION (long)
> >> Ed Gargiulo did report at the 1990 SLA Usersg group meeting that slicing
> >> the user part took 2.5 hours on a
> >> 386 computer. gargiulo@a1.umc.dupont.com
> >
> >I looked it up. The documentation with the SLA Usersgroup part states
> >a slice time of 5 hours, 55 minutes, and 30 seconds on a 16 MHz 386
> >system.
>
> What report was you reading?At the 1990 user meeting in San Antonio, Ed
After reading about the user part in the Rapid Prototyping report,
I called Ed and he sent me a packet with a disk containing the
user part, some instructions, a letter, and some forms to fill out
when sending in a part to be tested. In that packet he included
the data from a run that he did. In there, the slice time was
reported as "5:55:30" which I have trouble interpreting as anything
but almost 6 hours. I can't look up the slice thickness as the
document is at work. I do remember calculating that it would have
made 150 layers (0.010" per layer, I think). This was almost
2 years ago that I recieved the packet of info from Ed.
--> Mike Brindley
Previous message
| Next message
Back to 1994 index