Re: thin layers
From:
Brian Bauman (Accelerated Technologies , Inc.)
Date:
Saturday, January 21, 1995
From: Brian Bauman (Accelerated Technologies , Inc.)
To: Elaine Hunt (Clemson University), RP-ML
Date: Saturday, January 21, 1995
Subject: Re: thin layers
Here at ATI, we run both the SLS and SLA processes. Since SLA is being
discussed, I will give feed back on the SLS process.
We run parts at .004, .005, .006 layer thickness and at times, if the part
geometry is simple, we will run greater than .006. Most builds are run at
.006 layers to improve the speed of the process without sacrificing much on
surface definition.
However, by using a 50 micron powder such as Fine-Nylon and running parts
at .004 layers, we definitely improve our part detail and part "crispness".
The part also appears to have increased density by sintering less material
between layers. We haven't seen much success with other materials at .004
layer thickness.
Once part size increases and part detail decreases, parts are run at .005
or .006 layer thickness to improve build time as well as reduction in curl.
Since less energy is being applied between layers, the part has a less
propensity to curl and retain heat.
Previous message
| Next message
Back to 1995 index