(no subject)
From:
Ian Gibson (University of Hong Kong)
Date:
Monday, February 27, 1995
From: Ian Gibson (University of Hong Kong)
To: RP-ML
Date: Monday, February 27, 1995
On Sun, 26 Feb 1995 00:42:03 -0800 (PST), M. Burns <mburns@netcom.com> wrote:
> I disagree. How can a machine capable of generating a 3-D solid
>object directly from computer data be overpriced at anything less than a
>million dollars? Look at the productivity gains that manufacturers using
You appear to be at odds with yourself Marshall. In some articles you say
that everybody should have an RP machine in their home and now you say that the vendors should maintain their overinflated costing system. How can we
expect anyone to treat them as anything but an expensive luxury until the
costs come down to similar prices to those of other CNC machines?
Manufacturers in HK are generally uncreative, they only adopt technology
when they see an obvious benefit. Neither are they impressed by their
peers when they see them using RP. They tend to use RP when they are
requested to by their Western parent companies. They benefit and suffer at
the same time from geography. With China on the doorstep they have access
to the largest single market in the world. They also have access to an
extremely cheap labour source as well as the support of the Chinese
government to supply them with technology and designs. However, this market
is not particularly discerning and although increasing in their
sophistication, is not exactly in the same league as other countries that
demand this weeks model.
One might say that the recent copywrite dispute is an encouraging prospect
from an RP point of view since it may encourage HK industry to be more
creative.
These are my reasons for wanting to do an in-depth series of case studies.
HK industry is just waking up to 3D CAD and RP. The information that is
currently available is largely anecdotal, vendor oriented,
technically oriented, and/or specific to the individual requirements of an
industrial user. The choice of 3D CAD alone can be a bewildering prospect.
If you are then considering RP it can be enough to stop you in your tracks.
You ask about the utilisation of machines in HK. 2 out of the 4 have quite
a high profile. One will be used for training of graduate students, the
other as part of a technology transfer centre. Both of these machines are
very new and should be in operation by the summer. I am encouraged by their
attitude but await results.
I dont think that the market is saturated, in fact my main concern is that
these machines are being handled with kid gloves with industry being 'kept
away from the coal face for their own good'. I would also like to see more
diversity with something other than SLA being made available.
My final point relates to my case study approach. I would like to get
something started. Is there anyone out there who would like to participate
in a small experiment? If I create a small STL file would anyone like to
FTP it across and build it for me? If successful then this will prove that
I can get parts built outside HK. I cant afford bureau rates but I will
cover any direct costs involved.
Sorry about this being a rather sprawling mailing, Ill try and keep things
shorter in future.
Ian Gibson
Previous message
| Next message
Back to 1995 index