Re: SolidWorks for RP

From: Pierre Bertrand (bertrand@francomedia.qc.ca)
Date: Fri May 10 1996 - 20:23:48 EEST


Hong Ding wrote:
>
> Hi Steven,
>
> I noticed that you might have tried SolidWorks95
> for a while for your RP applications according to
> your message on 16 Dec. 1995. I would like to hear
> from you about the surface modeling and STL files
> of SolidWorks95 for the purpose of RP. I understand
> that Parasolid has a good capability for
> free-form surface modeling, has SolidWorks95 taken
> a full advantage of that ?
>
> If you have experience with Pro/E, I would
> appreciate it if you could also give me a short
> comparison between SolidWorks95 and Pro/E in terms
> of surface modeling capability and
> accuracy/time/size tradeoff in STL files.
>
> Can anyone else provide helpful information ?
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Hong

I am also interested in the results. Furthermore, please advise if
anyone has used Topsolid. This is another new 3d package.

Pierre Bertrand
Kaiplast Inc.
Canada



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 22:37:19 EEST