RE: IETF Feedback on AS#1

From: Nancy B. Turaj (nturaj@mail04.mitre.org)
Date: Wed Dec 18 1996 - 20:53:58 EET


Chuck:
Back into my mailbox today.
I don't know what you and Mats worked out on the below message. Could you use
my help in working these suggested changes? I am working most of the days
between now and the end of the year. I also have notes from the meeting,
unless you've made the changes already.

And .. I can't find lincoln's email address hanging around in any messages.
Can either Chuck or Rik send it to me. I'd like to thank him for our lovely
dinner in San Jose.

Cheers,
Nancy

>FYI...
>
>
>The feedback from the IETF Meeting yesterday, on the AS#1 were:
>
>-Make consistent throughout the reference to md5 and/or sha1 according
>to new recommendations (sha1)
>
>-Examples. Move all examples to Appendix of the requirements document.
>Replace examples with a way to describe which RFC's and drafts go into
>each scenario (like on the slide shown).
>
>-Keep receipts example, because here we are actually recommending new
>use.
>
>-Take down to a bare minimum, any descriptions of S/MIME or PGP/MIME
>that can be found in the referenced docs.
>
>-2.3.2 - Clarify the request for receipt vs. signed receipt
>
>-S/MIME: Use Multipat/signed instead of application/x-pkcs7-mime etc...
>(1847 based. Makes S/MIME and PGP/MIME consistent)
>
>
>These changes will be made as soon as possible, although I am on vacation
>starting NOW. I'll work out with Chuck what can be done when.
>
>Regards,
>
>Mats
>_____________________________________________________________
>Mats Jansson, LiNK mjansson@agathon.com
>2317 Broadway, Suite 330
>Redwood City, CA 94063 v: +1-415-780-9039
>http://www.agathon.com f: +1-415-780-9069
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 22:37:50 EEST