In-House Equipment Justification Help!

• Next message: Robert B. Zajeski: "Re: Materialise Rapid Prototyping software tutorials during 3D Systems User Group meeting"
• Previous message: Innomation Systems & Technologies Pte Ltd: "not Iamgeware..Imageware"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hello,

I have a couple of quick questions for anyone who has gone through the
justification process to bring RP equipment in-house.

1) Do you have any data on how many models were being requested after
the equipment was in-house vs. using service bureaus?

2) Any data on the average % increase in model requests over a several
year period?

3) Any "easy to overlook" but "important to address" issues for the
justification?

Thanks,

Chad L Buchanan
c.l.buchanan@ctc.cummins.com

For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/

• Next message: Robert B. Zajeski: "Re: Materialise Rapid Prototyping software tutorials during 3D Systems User Group meeting"
• Previous message: Innomation Systems & Technologies Pte Ltd: "not Iamgeware..Imageware"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 22:44:59 EEST