Justin Kidder wrote:
> Here is the link for the paper that Marshall Burns presented at CMU:
> http://www.ices.cmu.edu/reports/DMSFF95/index.html
Thanks Justin for finding that. Now actually, that is the link for
the whole workshop, which is of course of interest to members of the
list discussing alternatives to StL.
To look at my paper specifically, the link is
http://www.ices.cmu.edu/reports/DMSFF95/burns.html. I've looked it over
again (for the first time in several years) and still think its a pretty
good statement of what a future fabricator data format needs to be able
to do. It also offers a suggestion on how to overcome the problem of
incompatible data formats by using a handshaking protocol. I'm certainly
interested in feedback from list members on the ideas in this paper.
-- Marshall Burns Marshall@Ennex.com***************************************************************** ***** ENNEX(TM) CORPORATION ***** Fabbing the Future(TM) ***************************************************************** ***** 10911 Weyburn Avenue, Suite 332, Los Angeles, U.S.A. 90024 ***** Phone: +1 (310) 824-8700. Fax: +1 (310) 824-5185 ***** E-mail: Fabbers@Ennex.com. Web site: http://www.Ennex.com *****************************************************************
For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 22:45:48 EEST