Andrew:
My comments preceeded by <<<<<<<
At 03:52 PM 11/13/98 -0500, you wrote:
>Dear RPers,
>First of all, thanks again for the wonderful replies that I got. Those are
>wonderfully great.
>I still have some questions, however, that I'd be grateful if you, as the
>RP users, would give me some opinions.
>
>1. Who and when do you think, RP started "making friends" with investment
>casting?
<<<<<<<< RP which provided acceptable resolution, finish, accuracy and
economy (machine price/build speed) in an acceptable material of
construction was "friendly" to our needs.
>
>2. What, do you think, are the most recent developments in RP that are very
>useful in investment casting tooling?
>These can be techniques, machine or material.
<<<<<<<< Improvements in the above named characteristics have been coming along.
>
>3. What do you think the future directions of RP in investment casting?
>In other words, say, if you are granted only 3 wishes how to make RP meet
>the needs of investment casting tooling.
>What would those 3 wishes be?
<<<<<<<< Further improvements in the above named characteristics would be
welcomed. Best Regards, Tom Richards, Metallurgist
>
>Thank you a zillion times for your time,
>I look forward to hearing from you.
>
>Yours sincerely,
>Andrew Kaley
>========================================================
>
>Andrew S. Kaley
>Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
>The Pennsylvania State University
>207 Hammond Building
>University Park, PA 16802
>
>Phone: (814) 863-2378
>Fax: (814) 863-4745
>E-mail: ask144@psu.edu
>
>========================================================
>
>For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/
>
>
For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 22:47:13 EEST