Re[2]: Ambiguous Measurement Terminology (Refined)

From: jim@paramountind.com
Date: Wed Feb 03 1999 - 18:53:32 EET

Next message: Fusioneng@aol.com: "Re: Off topic: Very small holes in steel"
Previous message: Guy.Bourdeau@coulter.com: "Re: Post Cure of SL5220"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

John I trust your suggestion is on the small error scale. What do we
use as nominal?

______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Ambiguous Measurement Terminology (Refined)
Author: "John Wright" <johnw@ra-ltd.co.uk> at INTERNET
Date: 2/3/99 4:59 AM

With regard to some rapid prototyping - shouldn't the unit of measure be the
"barn door"

Best Regards
John Wright
Response Associates Ltd.
PO Box 1528
Gillingham
Dorset
UK
Tel: +44 1747 822404
Fax: +44 1747 822545
email : johnw@ra-ltd.co.uk








For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/


For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/

For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/

Next message: Fusioneng@aol.com: "Re: Off topic: Very small holes in steel"
Previous message: Guy.Bourdeau@coulter.com: "Re: Post Cure of SL5220"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 22:50:53 EEST