Glyn, Paul, et al:
What does the final configuration look like? Would it be possible to use the
microstereolithography to form a "shape", vapor deposit the desired
substrate, then etch/disolve the original shape?
Roger Spielman
Rocketdyne Power & Propulsion
The Boeing Co.
> ----------
> From: PROFORM AG[SMTP:proform@proform.ch]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 1999 12:04 PM
> To: scargo@mindspring.com
> Cc: rp-ml@bart.lpt.fi
> Subject: Re: How fine can you go?
>
> Glyn,
>
> we have a prototype microstereolithography apparatus that is able to
> achieve resolutions in the 5 - 10 um range (including layer thicknesses in
> that order). There are still some geometrical restrictions for the parts
> that can be made by that process but we would be happy to give it a try.
>
> Sincerely
>
> Paul Bernhard
> Managing Director
>
> Glyn Churchman wrote:
>
> I wanted to pass this along for the RP community to comment on. It
> appeared today on the model making list. I am guessing that it is not
> possible. If you make the assumption that they are going to investment
> cast a metal part, would anyone have any ideas? Here is the post:
>
> Has anyone come across any new RP machines with build levels smaller
> that the Sanders machine? The Sanders has a Build layer: 0.0005 in. An
> engineer came to me with a upcoming project that will have small channels
> for a medical instrument. Micro Fluid Dynamics is greatly affected by the
> steps left behind. Believe it or not he is looking for one in the 5-10
> microns. (This is where you might be tempted to laugh)
>
> Sincerely,
> Glyn Churchman@Prototech, Inc.
>
>
>
>
For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 22:51:44 EEST