RE: Surfacer vs IcemSurf vs....

From: Anshuman Razdan (razdan@asu.edu)
Date: Tue Jun 15 1999 - 19:54:10 EEST


Perhaps Brian/Ashim/Venkat from Paraform should shed a light on this issue
for majority of people who have not seen Paraform in action. However, to be
fair to them they are in the process of releasing the software - which is a
hectic time !! But would love to hear from them nonetheless !!

AR

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rp-ml@ltk.hut.fi [mailto:owner-rp-ml@ltk.hut.fi]On Behalf Of
Bert VandenBerg
Sent: Monday, June 14, 1999 11:47 AM
To: Jason Dickman
Cc: SCat3D@AOL.COM; rp-ml@bart.lpt.fi
Subject: Re: Surfacer vs IcemSurf vs....

Jason Dickman wrote:

> I agree with Steve about Paraform. It seems for years there really hasn't
> been a surfacing
> package that converts polys into NURBS... enter Paraform.

Can you tell more about the quality of polygon model required, and the
tools provided by Paraform to create the polygon model?

thanks

--
Bert van den Berg                   E-mail: bert@hymarc.com
Hymarc Ltd.                           http://www.hymarc.com
35 Antares Drive                        Tel: (613) 727-1584
Ottawa, Ontario  K2E 8B1                Fax: (613) 727-0441

For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 22:51:53 EEST