RE: plea for reason

From: Jeff McBride (jmcbri@woodward.com)
Date: Tue Nov 30 1999 - 16:30:57 EET

Next message: Bert van den Berg: "thanks"
Previous message: David K. Leigh: "Re: plea for reason"
Maybe in reply to: Michael Rees: "plea for reason"
Next in thread: Michael Hirschmann: "Re: plea for reason"
Reply: Michael Hirschmann: "Re: plea for reason"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Michael: Thanks for your voice of reason. I don't doubt that there are
issues that need to be settled, but not here. I see this as much more
harmful than all the the spamming flack.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Rees [mailto:rees@michaelrees.com]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 1999 9:44 PM
To: rp-ml@bart.lpt.fi
Subject: plea for reason

Yo, Hello, knock knock, anyone home. I think we've had enough of this. Just
leave it alone. We had almost the same flame war last year. Someone, I don't
care
who, just say no. for example "No I won't post messages that I know is going
to
piss everyone off" or "no I won't respond to a message that pisses me off".
Please just let it die.

-- michael rees effective immediately suite Number 301 www.michaelrees.com 1015 Washington Ave 314 494 7393 St. Louis Mo 63101 msr@michaelrees.com

For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/

Next message: Bert van den Berg: "thanks"
Previous message: David K. Leigh: "Re: plea for reason"
Maybe in reply to: Michael Rees: "plea for reason"
Next in thread: Michael Hirschmann: "Re: plea for reason"
Reply: Michael Hirschmann: "Re: plea for reason"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 22:53:35 EEST