RE: OBJET Patentability

From: Geoff Smith-Moritz (rpreport@cadcamnet.com)
Date: Thu Apr 20 2000 - 22:24:48 EEST


Does everyone know that ChathamRes@aol.com is Al Hastbacka (Sanders Design),
who has already gotten flack for making comments about the Objet? Al may be
correct about potential patent conflicts, but he is also involved in making
and selling machines and might view the Objet as competition.

Geoff Smith-Moritz
CAD/CAM Publishing, Inc.
1010 Turquoise Street, Suite 320
San Diego, CA 92109 U.S.A.
Phone: (858) 488 0533 FAX: (858) 488-6052
Web site: www.cadcamnet.com

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-rp-ml@bart.lpt.fi [mailto:owner-rp-ml@bart.lpt.fi]On Behalf
Of ChathamRes@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2000 4:28 AM
To: rp-ml@bart.lpt.fi
Subject: OBJET Patentability

In analyzing our RP Patent library, it appears that patenting the OBJET RP
System will be quite a challenge.

3D Systems extensive coverage in the area of UV curable photocurable based
systems can present a significant block to patenting the OBJET technology.

Regards,
REH

For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/

For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 23:03:19 EEST