Lee;
I can see that from the tone of your letter you are raising a personal attach on
the character and physical disabilities of Mr. Denton. We should be focusing on
the intent of what he meant not on the key stroke error itself. He should not
be disenfranchised because he is forced to use a data input system which is
flawed and outdated. Though his fingers might be short and stubby we must make
sure that we do everything possible to ascertain his intent. I propose that we
allow Mr. Denton the opportunity to re-submit his email thereby clarifying his
intent and ensuring that he will not feel disenfranchised.
Ken
Karl:
After examining your typing skills in which you were requesting "tow"
locations, the decision has been rendered to count your request as faulty and
therefore invalid! We could of course file someone's briefs (Tom would probably
like to examine some I'm sure) in order to determine whether this was a partial
stroke error or possibly an intentional key stroke generated by sausage
fingers.
Tom, you know you must respond!
Lee Eisinger
KDenton@williams-int.com wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I just realized that the User Group meeting is in Florida this year and with
> all of the election results so messed up I wanted to ask Are we sure this is
> where we should be going? Is it to late to demand a revote (sorry Tom) to
> see if there were individuals that could have voted for tow locations?
>
> Just having fun!
>
> Karl
>
> For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/
For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/
For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 23:04:44 EEST