From: Steven Adler \( A3DM \) (adler@a3dm.com)
Date: Fri Jun 07 2002 - 22:40:32 EEST
hidden as " an internal proprietary process" , I suspect there are thousands
of infringements in almost every technology. The marketing of that process I
believe is the catalyst for a legal suit in most cases
Steven Adler, CEO
Automated 3D Modeling, Inc
www.a3dm.com
adler@a3dm.com
603.433.4369
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bathsheba Grossman" <sheba@bathsheba.com>
To: <rp-ml@rapid.lpt.fi>
Sent: Friday, June 07, 2002 2:45 PM
Subject: Re: homemade inkjet printer head
> On Fri, 7 Jun 2002, Markus Hitter wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag den, 6. Juni 2002, um 20:43, schrieb Bathsheba Grossman:
> >
> > > But, as the Solidscape
> > > rep who did my install explained it to me, "any time you put one drop
> > > of wax on top of another, we own it." Truth?
> >
> > Do patents apply to homemade machines?
>
> IANAL, but it's not clear to me why the status of a homemade machine
> would be different from any other kind of machines. Isn't it just a
> matter of whether the patent holder bothers to come after your sorry
> homemade ass?
>
>
> --
> -Sheba
> Bathsheba Grossman (831) 429-8224
> Sculpture bathsheba.com
> Creative prototyping protoshape.com
>
>
> For more information about the rp-ml, see http://rapid.lpt.fi/rp-ml/
>
For more information about the rp-ml, see http://rapid.lpt.fi/rp-ml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 21 2003 - 20:13:52 EET