Re: The RPML should be fixed and not abandoned.

From: Eitan Priluck (eitan@biomodel.com)
Date: Wed May 14 2003 - 02:17:58 EEST

• Next message: parts@protocallonline.com: "RE: THIS is Spam - --Re: The new rp-ml list"
• Previous message: Dick Edwards: "RE: The RPML should be fixed and not abandoned."
• In reply to: EdGrenda@aol.com: "The RPML should be fixed and not abandoned."
• Next in thread: Charles Overy: "RE: The RPML should be fixed and not abandoned."
• Reply: Charles Overy: "RE: The RPML should be fixed and not abandoned."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I could not agree with you more Ed. Well said.

-Eitan Priluck

• Next message: parts@protocallonline.com: "RE: THIS is Spam - --Re: The new rp-ml list"
• Previous message: Dick Edwards: "RE: The RPML should be fixed and not abandoned."
• In reply to: EdGrenda@aol.com: "The RPML should be fixed and not abandoned."
• Next in thread: Charles Overy: "RE: The RPML should be fixed and not abandoned."
• Reply: Charles Overy: "RE: The RPML should be fixed and not abandoned."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sat Jan 17 2004 - 15:17:29 EET