Re: [rp-ml] re: moving RP-ML server

From: Wesley Brooks (wesbrooks@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Jun 29 2007 - 10:02:13 EEST


Another worth a look:

http://www.freelists.org/

Wesley Brooks.

On 28/06/07, Jim Quinn <jquinn@www.matscieng.sunysb.edu> wrote:
>
> Folks -
>
> Being an "academic", I do not believe that we are
> less biased or more long-term stable. Instead,
> I suggest a Yahoo group. The platform is stable
> and easy to manage.
>
> regards,
>
> JQuinn
>
>
>
>
>
> > From owner-rp-ml@rapid.lpt.fi Thu Jun 28 11:37:49 2007
> > Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 15:16:19 +0100
> > From: Adrian Bowyer <A.Bowyer@bath.ac.uk>
> > MIME-Version: 1.0
> > To: Greg Pettengill <coteart@gmail.com>
> > CC: rp-ml@rapid.lpt.fi
> > Subject: Re: [rp-ml] Reports of the Death of the RPML have been greatly exaggerated...
> >
> > Greg Pettengill wrote:
> >
> > > I still believe it would be wise to not rule out potential help just
> > > because it is commercial.
> >
> > I fully agree. The ideal would be an academic-run service that is
> > commercially sponsored with some sort of wall/guarantee between the
> > sponsors and the service to prevent sponsors going off in a huff if
> > there is the odd critical comment about their product.
> >
> > We don't want to end up in the dishonorable position that academic
> > medicine and the pharmacological companies find themselves in, do we? :-)
> >
> > --
> >
> > Best wishes
> >
> > Adrian
> >
> > Dr Adrian Bowyer
> > http://staff.bath.ac.uk/ensab
> > http://reprap.org
> >
>
>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 18:13:05 EET