Re: [rp-ml] Re: Laser scanner recommendations?

Kevin, et al...

STL model for both 3D printing and CNC milling. Objects of various
sizes and complexity. Diverse student environment, so all sorts of
twists to be expected! :-)

David
PSU

Sent from iPhone. Please pardon brevity and/or typos...

On Feb 15, 2010, at 8:05 AM, <kpakravan@materialise.com> wrote:

> Hi Dave and list,
>
> Can you define what the final target is (STL for additive
> fabrication, CAD model for further design changes, FEA model for
> simulation...)? What type of geometry you plan to be scanning (e.g.
> architectural, automotive, art...)?
>
> I don't know a ton about the NextEngine scanner, but I believe there
> is a "large volume" add-on available.
>
> Kevin Pakravan
> RPM Process Consultant
> Materialise USA, LLC
> 3009 Miller Road Ann Arbor, MI 48103
> Direct 734-585-3389
> General 734-662-5057
> Fax 734-662-7891
> http://www.materialise.com/
> Free software for STL inspection and compression. Download it now at MiniMagics.com
> This e-mail and its attachments may contain confidential
> information. It is intended
> solely for the use of the addressee(s) named herein. Any use of the
> information
> contained herein by other persons is prohibited. If you have
> received this e-mail
> by mistake, please immediately notify the sender and permanently
> delete the original
> as well as any copy thereof. Materialise USA, LLC does not accept
> any liability for
> the contents of this e-mail and its attachments.
>
> From: owner-rp-ml@rapid.lpt.fi on behalf of David Celento
> Sent: Sat 2/13/2010 12:49 PM
> To: rp-ml
> Subject: [rp-ml] Re: Laser scanner recommendations?
>
> Hi RP-ers,
>
> I've "seen" photogrammetry, but in truth am not all that familiar with
> it. Does this generate point cloud data? How is the accuracy?
> Recommended software?
>
> As for the Next Engine laser scanner, I've looked at this product and
> it looks pretty slick... and of course, Jay Leno seems to like
> it. :-) However, the capture size is about half the size that is
> desired. Any others that come to mind that could capture at least 1m
> x 1m?
>
> Many thanks for any and all suggestions!
>
> David
>
>
> Assistant Professor, Architecture: Digital Design / Digital
> Fabrication
> Penn State: Stuckeman School of Architecture & Landscape Architecture
> www.digifab.psu.edu www.design.psu.edu 814.321.5229
> mobile
>
> On Feb 13, 2010, at 12:01 PM, John Morewood wrote:
>
> > Hi David,
> > I have used the NextEngine 3D Laser Scanner HD for over three
> > years and highly recommend it -
> >
> > http://www.nextengine.com/
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > -jay-
>
> >> Would photogrammetry work for your situation? I think it meets all
> >> your criteria, but I’m not familiar with it enough to say for sur
> e.
> >>
> >> -Chuck Stapleton
> >> chuck@churtle.com
> >> +1-562-644-6838 mobile
> >> +1-206-337-0537 fax
> >> +1-562-846-1838 International
> >>
> >>> From: owner-rp-ml@rapid.lpt.fi [mailto:owner-rp-ml@rapid.lpt.fi]
> >>> On Behalf Of David Celento
> >>> Sent: Saturday, February 13, 2010 11:17 AM
> >>> To: rp-ml
> >>> Subject: [rp-ml] Laser scanner recommendations?
> >>>
> >>> RP'ers...
> >>>
> >>> Seeking recommendations on a small, affordable desktop laser
> >>> scanner.
> >>>
> >>> Ideal unit would have:
> >>> - large capture size of ± 1 meter by 1 meter (could be smaller)
> >>> - ability to capture color image and overlay onto scan data
> >>> - small turntable that allows auto compositing of scan data for
> 360°
> >>> - software not essential (since we have Geomagic) but desirable
> >>> - ease of use and affordability a plus.
> >>> - high degree of accuracy is not needed.
> >>> - non contact
> >>> - (no enclosed boxes, cnc, or articulated arm attachments)
> >>>
> >>> I have previous experience with the Konica Minolta Vivid scanner,
> >>> but am seeking one that is less expensive. No need for a viewing
> >>> screen or capturing data in the field, thus standalone use
> >>> (without a computer) or portability is not needed.
> >>>
> >>> Many thanks for any suggestions or recommendations!
> >>>
> >>> David Celento
> >
>
Received on Mon Feb 15 16:17:38 2010