Am 03.10.2016 um 22:32 schrieb Bathsheba:
>
> Hello rpml-brain. I wish I had a scanner for small (<10cm) things at high (.1mm) accuracy, but I don't have much (<$1000) budget. Convex only is OK, I can do without undercuts, but accuracy is important: .5mm won't do.
Depending on how much you're willing to hack: optical scanners are scalable. Put a macro lens in front of the camera, move the camera closer to the object and the resolution should raise. At the cost of scan field size, of course.
> PS yeah it would be really nice if messages on this list had the list address somewhere.
It does now! For this message I simply clicked on "Reply" and it's addressed to rp-ml. Excellent! :-)
Markus
--
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter
http://www.jump-ing.de/
Received on Tue Oct 04 2016 - 01:40:54 EEST