Todd Grimm wrote:
> My interest is specifically in building traps in 5180. But, for the
> of the all users, responses with respect to any resin would be welcome.
> We have tried many solutions:
> - Build no traps
> - Holes and plugs
> - Multiple sweeps
> - Lengthen Z wait
I too share your love for trapped volumes on the SLA. I am using the epoxy
rather than the 5081 resin - but strangely enough the epoxies are about as
even though they are thinner,
For those that don't know what a trapped volume is on a SLA - imagine
coffee cup upside down. This is not a trapped volume and causes no problems
except that you have a bunch of supports up on the inside holding the bottom
(which is inverted at the top of the build).
Ideally, you would turn the cup over and build the bottom at the 'bottom'.
makes supporting much easier since all you need is some from the platform to
the cup bottom. However .... The cup is now a trapped volume and holds
The resin inside the cup is trapped in the part geometry and cannot flow as
layers change. It also forms a meniscus at the top. This interferes with
since resin inside the trapped volume tends to flow under the wiper blade
behind it - and not leave the trapped volume. If left uncorrected - the
buildup on the edge cures and continues to get higher than it should be.
Eventually, the blade catches this raised edge and at best makes a poor part
and at worst rips the platform off the supports destroys the build (and
breaks your system)
Of all the choices listed above - we try just not building them the most.
usually means mores supports - but getting a good part is worth it. If this
work - we try a combination of all of the rest of the choices: Model a
hole in the
bottom of the trapped volume - and a plug to fill it, sweep multiple times,
lengthen the wait time between layers. We try to add at least a .5 hole, go
sweeps and 45 -60 sec z wait. Most of the time this will work but results in
longer build time.
We had a large 10 x 10 x 5 chassis fail yesterday which had a 1 " diameter
in the bottom. It started hitting about 2.5 inches up - and failed about .5
further. Today, we are cutting the box in half on the cad system, flipping
side 90 degrees - and building - then gluing them back together. We often
little alignment tabs on the part to help in the gluing back together. This
often saves time, effort, and aggravation.
Regards, Todd Stahlhut
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 22:37:06 EEST