RE: TriSpectives Reborn?

From: Anshuman Razdan (
Date: Mon Jun 29 1998 - 18:31:47 EEST

I know several companies in the near past have dumped ACIS as the kernel
(Intergraph etc..). How viable is ACIS (as a company) and is the stock still
in pennies ?

-----Original Message-----
From: []On Behalf Of
michael rees
Sent: Sunday, June 28, 1998 8:38 PM
To: Scott Ellis
Subject: Re: TriSpectives Reborn?

Scott Ellis wrote:

> As for Trispectives the user interface was good and it was reasonably easy
to learn. If the solid modeling tools were just a bit stronger it would have
been a winner.
Dear Scott,

That sounds really optimistic to me. I fooled with trispectives and
found it deeply wanting. The cheap price tag might be the reason. Iron
Cad is no cheapy.

The acis kernel is succesfully used in a couple of hundred cad packages.
I'd be surprised if that was the problem.

At the same time, I know many companies have had a hell of a time
adapting the acis kernel to their software. I'm suspiscious of it in low
end packages. Has anyone got a reason for this?


michael rees SCULPTOR
1212 w 8th St. Bldg B #2, 	816 753 3020 voice
KC, Mo 64101			816 753 1542 fax

For more information about the rp-ml, see

For more information about the rp-ml, see

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 22:46:05 EEST