Exactly my point. You seen one, you've practically seen them all.
That's why I've stayed off the speaking circuit this year. We're doing more
of the same (with some refinements, so who wants to hear it again?).
Since the market is so competitive, (OEM's, Service Bureaus, and
others) do you really expect the SHARING on a USER-LEVEL? This type of
information was typical 5 years ago, but not today in the age of
"proprietary processes". Can this be a new level of openness on the rise in
Steve Deak e-mail: email@example.com
Manager-Rapid Prototyping voice: (+1) 513-579-3270
Hasbro, Incorporated fax: (+1) 513-579-3250
615 Elsinore Place
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 USA "Our Business is FUN!"
> From: DANIEL CHARLES DAVIS[SMTP:DANIEL@proton.com.my]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 1998 2:59 AM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: RE: Elaine's RPUG idea
> There seem to be a feeling on the RP-ML that machine-specific user group
> meetings and SME-RPA conventions are not delivering what is expected.
> Could that be because they are the same presenters at the same venues
> speaking to the same participants about the same subjects? ....SNIP......
For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 22:46:28 EEST