RE: Surfacer vs IcemSurf vs.... Paraform

From: Brian Kissel (
Date: Sat Aug 07 1999 - 01:26:08 EEST

Hi Anshuman and fellow RPers,

Paraform V1.0 has now been completed and will be demonstrated at Siggraph
this year in Los Angeles: We'll be in booth

Please check out our new website ( for more information on
the company and products.


Brian Kissel
CEO, Paraform, Inc.
795 San Antonio Road, Palo Alto, CA 94303
Phone: 650.846.2110 Fax: 650.846.2160 URL:

-----Original Message-----
From: [] On Behalf Of
Anshuman Razdan
To: RP Mailing List
Subject: RE: Surfacer vs IcemSurf vs....

Perhaps Brian/Ashim/Venkat from Paraform should shed a light on this issue
for majority of people who have not seen Paraform in action. However, to be
fair to them they are in the process of releasing the software - which is a
hectic time !! But would love to hear from them nonetheless !!


-----Original Message-----
From: []On Behalf Of
Bert VandenBerg
Sent: Monday, June 14, 1999 11:47 AM
To: Jason Dickman
Subject: Re: Surfacer vs IcemSurf vs....

Jason Dickman wrote:

> I agree with Steve about Paraform. It seems for years there really hasn't
> been a surfacing
> package that converts polys into NURBS... enter Paraform.

Bert van den Berg                   E-mail:
Hymarc Ltd.                 
35 Antares Drive                        Tel: (613) 727-1584
Ottawa, Ontario  K2E 8B1                Fax: (613) 727-0441

For more information about the rp-ml, see

For more information about the rp-ml, see

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 22:52:19 EEST