Re: Stl slice algorithm

From: Gill Barequet (barequet@cs.Technion.AC.IL)
Date: Thu Jan 27 2000 - 23:53:48 EET

Mike Brindley wrote:
> (... slicing - snipped ...)
> The time consuming part of the topological slicing just described is
> reconstructing the topology of the surface, normally an O(n^2) algorithm.
> Using various well known techniques to speed up searches (trees, hashing,
> etc.) this algorithm becomes O(nlog(n)). The topology reconstrucion
> can be done ahead of time (before building starts), enabling 'slice-on-
> the-fly'.

Here are my two cents. Many years ago I compared many methods for
reconstructing the topological info (adjacencies of polygons) of a soup
of triangles (aka stl file). In principle (asymptotically, in the expected
case) the hashing approach should be the best, because under the assumption
of good hashing you expect to waste constant time per operation (insert,
find [delete is not needed here]), summing up to an O(n) expected-time
algorithm. However, the involved constant of proportionality is too high:
the hashing approach will eventually win for high-enough values of n, which
are larger than any file processed in practice. My experiments (again, about
10 years ago), led to the conclusion that the simple sort-and-scan approach
is the best for up to even millions of triangles. Let me explain in short
this approach. Assume we have n triangles. Then we have 3n edges, and
Theta(n) vertices (according to Euler's formula). First you need to identify
repeating vertices. Sort the vertices according to lexicographic order (say,
according to keys X, Y, Z, in this order). This is an O(n log n)-time step.
Now scan the sorted list in O(n) time and identify all duplicates. The same
approach works for finding adjacencies. Pile up all the 3n edges, keeping them
as pairs of 2 point indices (smaller index first; keep also a flag indicating
edge direction). Again, sort all edges in lexicographic order in O(n log n)
time, scan the sorted list in O(n) time and find all adjacencies. Nothing
of the above is new. I just claim that according to my experiments the
described approach is the fastest. Trees and friends give the same
functionality (and comparable running times) but require more overhead.


Gill Barequet, Ph.D. Phone: +972-4-829-3219
Faculty of Computer Science Fax: +972-4-822-1128
The Technion---IIT E-mail:
Haifa 32000 WWW:
                                "Life is NP-Hard." (-)

For more information about the rp-ml, see

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 23:02:42 EEST