RE: lightyear 1.1

From: Blasch, Larry (
Date: Wed Aug 23 2000 - 21:21:53 EEST


I prefer to think of SLA250 users as an endangered species... Although our
habitat is not threatened, a sustainable food supply is.

Should we demand federal protection status, and request bail-out money to
allow us to relocate/upgrade to the latest sustainable technology?

(Forget it, without our own lobby in Washington we could never get it


Lawrence R. Blasch
Design Engineer
CAE Systems Administrator
OPW Fueling Components
P.O. Box 405003
Cincinnati, OH 45240-5003 USA
Voice: (513) 870-3356
Fax: (513) 870-3338

* "Always remember you're unique,*
* just like everyone else." *

-----Original Message-----
From: Elaine Hunt []
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2000 1:28 PM
To: 'RP Mailing List'
Subject: RE: lightyear 1.1

At 01:21 PM 8/23/00 -0400, Deak, Steve wrote:
>To Scott's question, LY 1.1 requires buildstation 5.1 for 350/500/5000/7000
>machines. Not sure of the requirement for 250's.

As for the 250 users we got no upgrade for buildstation......... We all got
the CD but as you noticed it said 350/500/3500/5000, etc. We are truly the
dinosaurs.......... close to extinction.


Opinions, suggestions, and other controversial matter VOID where prohibited.

Elaine T. Hunt, Director
Laboratory to Advance Industrial Prototyping
Clemson University 206 Fluor Daniel Bldg.
Clemson, SC 29634-0925
864-656-0321 (voice) 864-656-4435 (fax)

For more information about the rp-ml, see

For more information about the rp-ml, see

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Jun 05 2001 - 23:04:09 EEST