For my sake and interest, would you please elaborate on the section in item 4 to address the following questions:
* What are the dimensions of the features that "dissolved in the support layer" ?
* What equipment was used for support remmoval ?
* Can you provide the STL file of the part which was inadequately formed as well as the part that "Sanders could not
I would also like to see the part that is built "40 to 50 times faster"
Rising to the challenge,
Sanders Design International
ps. Please be certain to respond to my email address as well as the rp-ml - for some reason I don't see everything that
is posted on the rp-ml.
> Thanks again rp-ml!
> I've summarized the responses I've received for everybody's benefit.
> ThermoJet Wax removal tip summary:
> 1. I assume you are referring to removal of the rough surface left by the
> supports. Have you tried a little bit of Johnson's paste wax on a
> Scotchbrite pad?
> 2. Johnson's Paste Wax smoothes out the surface.
> 3. 3DSystems recommends Orange Clean Supper Concentrate
> http://www.greatcleaners.com> to clean parts up after supports have been
> knocked off. We use a similar product called Citrol from National Chemical
> Laboratories, Inc. (1-800-Nat-Chem) It seems to be a little stronger and
> works well on parts and floors that have had support material ground into
> Note: this seems like a good lead to follow - also there's that cleaner
> called "Orange-Glo" which has been on a lot of infomercials lately.
> 4. I am a reseller for The Thermojet. Recently I worked on waxes to be cast
> as samples for several jewelry trade shows. I found that "Wax Kleen,"a Vigor
> Product, made by B.Jadow and Sons, Inc., works very well. It is 100%
> I also used xylene solvent also worked very well but, was a little more
> aggressive and it is a solvent of questionable carcinogenic properties. I
> also used a rotary file from Matt Wax (Adolfo Mattiello) that did not
> clog, as most wax paddles or rotary files do. I found not only can a
> Thermojet do parts a Sanders MM2 can't do, it can do them 40 to 50 times
> faster, with
> a 10 minute clean up (352 jets as apposed to 2). A part could be in
> production (built, cast the master, finished, rubber mold, cast for
> production) before a Sanders could build one part. I had to experience it
> myself, before I would comment on this. I admit some parts are better
> executed on the Sanders, but I saw parts that a Sanders could not build.
> This was with up facing surfaces,and lettering and thin parts (usually
> dissolved in the support layer
> removal on the Sanders). I have used both and as performs in my industry, I
> feel it's a outstanding output device. I am partial to CNC Mills, but thats
> me. I
> hope that this helps, beside Wax Kleen smells of Oranges, cool stuff
> (available through jewelry tool suppliers). Have Fun!!
> 5. 3D Systems has desribed a "citrus" degreaser, often sold by bike stores
> to remove chain residue. I have never tried it, we use unfriendly
> for this.
> 6. Have you tried the "All Citrus" Cleaner/Degreaser from Stoner? I used
> before I came to work for 3D and continue to this day.
> For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/
For more information about the rp-ml, see http://ltk.hut.fi/rp-ml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Fri Jan 04 2002 - 09:56:46 EET